A Rudy Giuliani campaign official is trying to focus more attention (presumably negative) about Romney’s Mormon faith by directing media to the SL Tribune story on Romney’s supposed link to the “White Horse Prophecy.” See here for the story.
I personally don’t think these types of tactics will work, and they reflect badly on candidates trying to use them.
Meanwhile, McCain has raised a much more interesting and thought-provoking questions regarding Romney’s immigration policies. I wish the candidates would concentrate on real issues like these rather than on garbage regarding candidates’ religion.
UPDATE: The Giuliani campaign has apologized to Mitt.
While the elaborate “White Horse Prophecy” has been repeatedly repudiated, the idea that “the Constitution will hang by the thread” and that “if it is to be saved, it will be by the Elders of Zion” is still persistent (though equally questionable as a statement of Joseph Smith). The latter is prominent enough in LDS thought, that I can’t imagine it doesn’t pass through the minds of many, if not most, LDS candidates for office.
The idea expressed in one comment on the story, that it only means the members of the church will vote, certainly doesn’t reflect the folklore surrounding this statement. While modest types will naturally avoid the game of claiming this “prophecy” refers to them individually, not all are modest. Bo Gritz comes to mind, as an LDS member who certainly thought he was going to be the great savior of the Constitution.
Ironically, I’ve run into many LDS who advocate very UNconstitutional measures, particularly when it comes to free speech issues, yet they consider themselves to be following their religion by doing so.
The Tribune interviewed George Cobabe, a writer for FAIR that researched the origins of the White Horse Prophecy. I wish they would have given him more air time. For those interested see Cobabe’s article at http://www.fairlds.org/pubs/whitehorse.pdf .
Using the white horse imagery has some problems. For the most part Mormon commenters have interpreted the white horse in Revelation as one that the prophet Enoch or Adam rode triumphantly. That goes back to section 77:7’s discussion about each of the 7 seals representing 1000 years, an interpretation that assumes young earth creationism. Skeptics of section 77 question whether it was written or influenced by Sidney Rigdon. Section 77 first appears in the 1839 history; it isn’t found in the Kirtland Revelation book like a lot of the D&C sections from that era are.
Joseph Smith’s Nauvoo sermons revisit the Book of Revelation and this time Joseph comments that Revelation is mostly about the future and not the past, unless it is obvious. That sets up a tension with the Enoch-on-a-white-horse .
Let me back up a little bit to a sermon made a few days earlier which Orson Hyde associates the White Horse with a triumphant Christ in the Second Coming. The same idea is found in Rev. 19:11-16
This prompted Josep Smith to correct him, but doesn’t comment on the white horse:
Also in Nauvoo, Joseph cut a fine conquerer-on-a-white-horse image with the Nauvoo legion. Prompting rumors after his death. From Gov. Ford as recorded in HC 7:37
Perhaps the genesis of this rumor comes from this account recorded in Oscar McConkie’s Remembering Joseph:
Another interesting early source is found in an 1847 publication The Prophet of the Jubilee, written by Dan Jones on an overseas mission, which speculates on the identity of Revelation’s horsies in a manner quite different than the White Horse Prophecy attributed to Joseph Smith. This shows that speculation was fairly common back then: