The entire title of this talk is: “45 Years of Chiasmus Conversations, Criteria and Creativity: What Chiasmus Proves and Does Not Prove.”
Jack Welch is a professor of law at the J. Reuben Clark Law School. He is the founder of FARMS and is the editor of the BYU Studies Quarterly. Welch is the person who discovered and popularized the idea of Chiasmus in the Book of Mormon.
(Note: Chiasmus is a form of Hebrew poetry that clearly exists in the Book of Mormon. How did Joseph Smith, an isolated relatively ignorant farm boy, learn about Hebrew poetry?)
“I’ve not made a career of chiasmus, but
chiasmus has made a career of me.”
“That was a chiasmus, by the way.”
Thus Welch began his talk. He told how he discovered chiasmus in the Book of Mormon when he was a missionary in Germany 45 years ago. He studied under Hugh Nibley at BYU. On his mission in Germany, he was at a lecture given by a Catholic scholar who mentioned chiasmus in the Bible. The scholar mentioned a book by Paul Gaechter on the book of Matthew, in which the author mentioned chiasmus in arguing that Matthew was writing for a Hebrew audience and used Hebraisms. Welch then bought Gaechter’s book.
Welch says he was awakened early in the morning on Aug. 16, 1967 with a clear prompting that if there was chiasmus in the Bible it must be in the Book of Mormon. He got out of bed and took out the Book of Mormon and turned to Mosiah chapter 4 and chapter 5. He said the chiasmus is Mosiah 5:10-12. The center of the chiasm is the idea of “transgression.”
He also mentioned Mosiah 3:18-19. There are 2467 words before that speech and 2476 words after it.
Remember that people in those days read from scrolls. Chiasmus was especially important because it draws attention to certain locations on the scroll.
On Aug. 29, 1967, he and his missionary companion visited a local professor and showed him the chiasms in the Book of Mormon. The professor agreed they were chiasms but when he heard they were from the Book of Mormon he asked them to leave.
Welch wrote to his professors in the U.S. and continued to study chiasmus in the New Testament and the Old Testament.
Leviticus 24:13-23 is a clear chiasmus in the Old Testament.
In Aug. 14, 1968, he visited Prof. Gaechter in Germany, who said that Welch has found a “life’s mission,” to study and promote chiasmus. Right after his mission, he went to visit Hugh Nibley, who was very excited about Welch’s discovery. Welch published about chiasmus in 1969.
He mentioned chiasmus in Alma 36 (the entire chapter is a beautiful example of chiasmus).
He then worked on “Chiasmus in Antiquity.”
There is a chiasmus archive in the L. Tom Perry special collections at a BYU library. His notes and letters on this issue are there. He wants to create a chiasmus resources web site and the Chiasmus Archive Academic Center (CAAC, a chiastic set of initials).
His “Chiasmus Bibliography” has 197 pages of links related to chiasmus.
Welch proposes 15 criteria for judging whether a passage is chiastic or not. Some chiastic phrases are stronger than others. He pointed out that Alma 36 is used by Alma to highlight his conversion, which was the central event in his life.
Welch points out that too many people look at chiasmus to prove the Book of Mormon is true. It does not “prove” it is true, but is an interesting intellectual “aid.” It does prove that the book is not chaotic, is orderly, was carefully written and was more profound than some (like Mark Twain) presumed. It also emphasizes the beauty of the Book of Mormon language.
Chiasmus does prove that the Book of Mormon was translated from a “Hebrew text.” There are some chiasms in the Book of Mormon that work better when you translate back to a Hebrew form. (example: Helaman 6:10 — ie, Zedekiah refers to the Hebrew ending “iah” which is “the Lord.” So, in Hebrew this scripture would have had “the Lord” twice at the center of the passage).
How much was known about chiasmus in 1829 when the Book of Mormon of Mormon was translated? Very, very little in the Americas, and it is not reasonable to think Joseph Smith would have known about it.
Many people have commented about how chiasmus has increased their testimonies of the Book of Mormon, and many scholars have mentioned it as a “confirmation” of the Book of Mormon.