I thought this article was interesting. Read it and then the title of the post will make sense. Strangely, I couldn’t decide if the name of the post should be 3.5:1 or 13:1 since the article essentially claims both. I hate statistics.
Discuss.
I thought this article was interesting. Read it and then the title of the post will make sense. Strangely, I couldn’t decide if the name of the post should be 3.5:1 or 13:1 since the article essentially claims both. I hate statistics.
Discuss.
Regardless of the actual statistics involved, it is certainly true that a Gingrich candidacy increases the likelihood of Pres. Obama’s reelection.
I know if the election were held today, and it was between Pres Obama or Newt, I’d be poking sharp objects in my eyes just to reduce the pain of determining which one would be worse. And then I’d probably listen to Stephen Colbert and write in Herman Cain….